Oops, I just saw this... thanks so much, Kenji!KENJI wrote:
Thanks RG and welcome back!

Moderator: Styles Bitchley
Oops, I just saw this... thanks so much, Kenji!KENJI wrote:
Thanks RG and welcome back!
I did watch and think it ill go down as one of the biggest letdowns in series finals. I did hear that it was shot before Alex decided he wasn't coming back so it as going to be just this seasons final, thus Catherine showing up at the very end. The final goodbyes from the teams was tearjerking and was not scripted so when Grover breaks down, that was really him.....MagnumsLeftShoulder wrote:So the finale was last night. I thought it was rushed and sloppy. Did anybody else watch?
Please forgive me but in the flashback, on the phone Wo Fat tells John McGarrett that he is the son of Doris...I know that info was always teased but had it come out before? So that entire ark with mystique, her appearing and disappearing, dying and not dying, the envelope with the code was all about the cash stuffed into her fake tomb and the widow felt she was entitled to her inheritance???? Uugh....MagnumsLeftShoulder wrote:I thought they might have filmed two versions of the scene on the plane. One with Cath and one without in case the show was renewed and Alex decided to return. The whole thing was disappointing and reminded me a lot of the end of JAG that came at the last minute and had to be re-written and re-edited quickly. Plus, there was one huge continuity error. Wo Fat's widow said John McGarrett and Wo Fat never met in person, but they did in the video that was filmed in the governor's office in ep 2.01.
MagnumsLeftShoulder wrote:Wo Fat wasn't really Doris' son, but she had sort of adopted him for a while. If I remember right, she had killed his mother and felt some guilt over it. The way the ending was written made Doris out to be more of a mercenary than anything else. She was only in the whole thing for money instead of some sort of patriotic duty. Me thinks the whole story was hastily written.
It's been years since I posted here and I only came back because I got an alert about a private message, and I didn't even remember what I posted here. I had to reread my last post.golfmobile wrote: ↑Sat Nov 02, 2013 6:25 pm Conch,
EXACTLY what I was thinking! (and then, OMG, there's another one?)
But, V V, I confess, I don't miss him . . . .
I do think, however, that most of us here understand when someone exaggerates to make a point.
golf
The acting on the original was anything but atrocious. Jack Lord was miles above Alex O'Loughlin in acting. He had more of a screen presence and played the role the way it should be played. Alex O'Loughlin played the role like an action hero, which isn't acting. He was more grave than Jack was. Scott Caan was awful, overacting all the time, and only Daniel Dae Kim and the actors who played supporting roles like Grover and Jerry acted well.MagnumsLeftShoulder wrote: ↑Tue May 02, 2017 4:19 amI beg to differ. People said the same thing about Don Johnson in the 80s and he was the only regular on Miami Vice with a shred of talent.the current lead is more a MTV cop with his 3 day beard, the producers hiring a Ken Doll instead of an actor.
There are things to complain about the reboot, but the acting is not one of them. Alex O'Loughlin's acting is the best thing about the show. The acting on the original was atrocious. Frankly, today's TV actors just blow actors from the 60s/70s TV era away and I say that as someone who likes a lot of shows from that time and disagrees with tons of PC crap currently coming out of Hollywood. Lack of acting talent is not what's wrong with modern TV. To me, the new Five-0 is the closest thing to 1980s style TV that's currently running.