Hey Ivan,IvanTheTerrible wrote: ↑Mon Dec 21, 2020 12:52 am See? That's the thing. Raymond Burr???? Talk about an actor that could make you go comatose. The man sleep-walked through all his roles, whether it was PERRY MASON or IRONSIDE. Mike Connors got nominated for MANNIX too. I don't mind Connors or MANNIX but Lord ran circles around him. Same with Karl Malden on STREETS OF SAN FRANCISCO. He got nominated but he's laughable doing the "tough cop" routine. I really like the show and like him in it but when he was trying to rough up a suspect it was hilarious. He felt like a silly uncle trying to act tough. William Conrad was also nominated for CANNON. What was his gimmick? He was a fat private eye! Seriously, that's it.
The only guy who was in Lord's league (of playing the hard-edged "don't cross me" type) was Telly Savalas playing KOJAK. He actually got nominated and won. The other guys are a joke compared to Lord. Seriously, we can all have our opinions but if you're gonna nominate Connors, Conrad, Malden, Burr (SHUDDER!) then where the heck is Lord's nomination? You're seriously gonna tell me he didn't deserve it but those others did? His show was 10 times more popular and had higher ratings than its peers and as an actor he blew the others away. But hey, if your preference is watching Burr fumbling around in his wheelchair and delivering lines in such a flat manner as to make your eyes glaze over then he's the guy for you. I imagine they nominated him because he probably represented a special interest group - those in wheelchairs?As we all know Lord didn't play the Hollywood game and was not the easiest to get along with. He was a perfectionist every step of the way and being very private he didn't socialize much. I suppose he ruffled some feathers along the way (James Bond/Star Trek) and maybe his peers didn't care for him. But the fact that he was a damn good actor remains and the fact that he didn't get recognized for it is truly unfair! 12 seasons and not a single nomination? You know something isn't right. That's fine if the Emmy's preferred the likes of Peter Falk or James Garner (both fine actors in their roles) because their roles were more animated and quirky, but if that's the case then guys like Mike Connors or William Conrad or Raymond Burr shouldn't have been nominated either because they played those same straight-laced, no-nonsense types that Lord did, except with less skill and watchability than Lord.
BTW, this isn't directed at you, Pahonu. Just my musings and observations in general. You and I already had this discussion few months back regarding Lord vs. Malden, but I can't see how Mike Connors had greater "range" than Lord. I won't even bother mentioning Mr. Comatose Burr.
I know it’s not directed at me. I enjoy the discussions. Mike Connors and Raymond Burr’s performances were never my favorite either. I do think Conrad was better, though not like Malden, and no where near as entertaining as Garner. I enjoyed David Janssen very much as Harry-O during this time and think he should have been nominated. His costar Anthony Zerbe actually won as supporting actor. It’s all very subjective, obviously. Also, these selections were not based on ratings or the popularity of the show in any way. As I mentioned in my first comment, these are peer awards, directors vote for fellow directors, composers select fellow composers, etc... I can see how difficult personalities, as you said Lord was known to be, might not get recognition by the people they work with. That seems to be at least part of the answer to a lack of any nominations.