79 examples of Obama’s corruption, lying, lawbreaking, etc.

Message

grundle · #1 Post by **grundle** » Mon May 14, 2012 11:26 pm

Here are 79 examples of Barack Obama’s corruption, lying, lawbreaking, and cronyism:

http://danfromsquirrelhill.wordpress.co ... -cronyism/

Jake · #2 Post by **Jake** » Tue May 15, 2012 2:51 am

Only 79? I think this is just the first chapter in a long book LOL!

#3 Post by **Styles Bitchley** » Tue May 15, 2012 8:23 am

I think this sort of post is a bad idea on the forum. It's just divisive.

Frodoleader · #4 Post by **Frodoleader** » Tue May 15, 2012 2:15 pm

Styles Bitchley wrote:I think this sort of post is a bad idea on the forum. It's just divisive.

Totally agree.

Pahonu · #5 Post by **Pahonu** » Tue May 15, 2012 3:35 pm

Jake wrote:Only 79? I think this is just the first chapter in a long book LOL!

I'll bite. W's already fills several books, LOL.

Pahonu · #6 Post by **Pahonu** » Tue May 15, 2012 4:35 pm

grundle wrote:Here are 79 examples of Barack Obama’s corruption, lying, lawbreaking, and cronyism:

http://danfromsquirrelhill.wordpress.co ... -cronyism/

Grundle, didn't you start the "Occupy" thread also?

Seaver41 · #7 Post by **Seaver41** » Tue May 15, 2012 5:07 pm

newsflash............they are ALL corrupt, liars, and lawbreakers........and as far as the cronyism goes, just how do you think they get elected?

Waterbug Blue · #8 Post by **Waterbug Blue** » Tue May 15, 2012 9:53 pm

Styles Bitchley wrote:I think this sort of post is a bad idea on the forum. It's just divisive.

Like!

grundle · #9 Post by **grundle** » Wed May 16, 2012 1:36 am

Styles Bitchley wrote:I think this sort of post is a bad idea on the forum. It's just divisive.

That's up to the moderator to decide. I will respect his wishes.

grundle · #10 Post by **grundle** » Wed May 16, 2012 1:37 am

Pahonu wrote:
grundle wrote:Here are 79 examples of Barack Obama’s corruption, lying, lawbreaking, and cronyism:

http://danfromsquirrelhill.wordpress.co ... -cronyism/
Grundle, didn't you start the "Occupy" thread also?

Yes.

#11 Post by **ConchRepublican** » Wed May 16, 2012 3:53 am

Jake wrote:Only 79? I think this is just the first chapter in a long book LOL!

Where's that little Facebook thumbs up thingie . . .

#12 Post by **Styles Bitchley** » Wed May 16, 2012 9:40 am

grundle wrote:That's up to the moderator to decide. I will respect his wishes.

True, but I can't help thinking how one of the most amazing things about this forum is how it brings so many different people from so many different places together. Thinking back to some of the posts we've had on why people keep coming back to watch Magnum episodes, the overwhelming theme is escapism. Its a fun place that didn't tread into territory that would exclude any of us based on our political, religious, etc. leanings. We're all aware that the US is deeply divided politically and the rhetoric from both sides will escalate over the coming months, but I'd encourage you keep this place as a refuge from all that.

Clearly, the rules for posting are up to James, but I think the general rule for dinner party conversation should apply (i.e., politics and religion should be avoided). This is not because I disagree with any of you, but rather to ensure everyone feels welcome.

AmandaByNight · #13 Post by **AmandaByNight** » Wed May 16, 2012 5:27 pm

Styles Bitchley wrote:
grundle wrote:That's up to the moderator to decide. I will respect his wishes.
True, but I can't help thinking how one of the most amazing things about this forum is how it brings so many different people from so many different places together. Thinking back to some of the posts we've had on why people keep coming back to watch Magnum episodes, the overwhelming theme is escapism. Its a fun place that didn't tread into territory that would exclude any of us based on our political, religious, etc. leanings. We're all aware that the US is deeply divided politically and the rhetoric from both sides will escalate over the coming months, but I'd encourage you keep this place as a refuge from all that.

Clearly, the rules for posting are up to James, but I think the general rule for dinner party conversation should apply (i.e., politics and religion should be avoided). This is not because I disagree with any of you, but rather to ensure everyone feels welcome.

Beautifully put.

#14 Post by **J.J. Walters** » Thu May 17, 2012 9:07 pm

Well said Styles. But I really don't have a problem with political posts in this sub-forum. If you don't like a post just ignore it.

The only types of posts I won't tolerate are the obvious ones: foul language, spam, links to porn, ad hominem personal attacks, threats of violence, illegal activities, racism, psychotic rants, etc.

grundle · #15 Post by **grundle** » Fri May 18, 2012 1:18 am

J.J. Walters wrote:Well said Styles. But I really don't have a problem with political posts in this sub-forum. If you don't like a post just ignore it.

The only types of posts I won't tolerate are the obvious ones: foul language, spam, links to porn, ad hominem personal attacks, threats of violence, illegal activities, racism, psychotic rants, etc.

Thanks for posting that.

That's why I put it in this forum, and not one of the others.

I never say that other kind of stuff.

79 examples of Obama’s corruption, lying, lawbreaking, etc.

79 examples of Obama’s corruption, lying, lawbreaking, etc.

Re: 79 examples of Obama’s corruption, lying, lawbreaking, e

Re: 79 examples of Obama’s corruption, lying, lawbreaking, e